作者：英吉
Brochure: Help conserve our city’s water supply. By converting the landscaping in your yard to a water-conserving landscape, you can greatly reduce your outdoor water use. A water-conserving landscape is natural and attractive, and it also saves you money.
Criticism: For most people with yards, the savings from converting to a water-conserving landscape cannot justify the expense of new landscaping, since typically the conversion would save less than twenty dollars on a homeowner’s yearly water bills.
Which of the following, if true, provides the best basis for a rebuttal of the criticism?
A.Even homeowners whose yards do not have water-conserving landscapes can conserve water by installing water-saving devices in their homes.
B.A conventional landscape generally requires a much greater expenditure on fertilizer and herbicide than does a water-conserving landscape.
C.A significant proportion of the residents of the city live in buildings that do not have yards.
D.It costs no more to put in water-conserving landscaping than it does to put in conventional landscaping.
E.Some homeowners use more water to maintain their yards than they use for all other purposes combined.
题目分析：A说家里没装新的节水装置的能通过安装其他东西来节水，原文后面那个人主要谈的是装新的是否省钱，这个选项不能支持后面那个人，与问题所问不符，干掉。B说传统的landscape比新的花费更过，至少谈的是新的和老的那个更匪浅，与第二个人所谈主题是吻合的，留着。C说大量的居民没有yard，那还谈个屁，原文反复谈的就是有yard到底是否要变成省水的landscape，你说没有yard，范围完全不对，杀。D说用老的不会比用新的成本更高，要不就是新的和老的一样，要不就是老的比新的便宜，能回答问题吗，显然不能，E手一些家庭使用水量多少，没说，杀！
