作者：英吉
Jennifer: Video rental outlets in Centerville together handled 10,000 fewer video rentals in 1994 than in 1993. The decline in rentals was probably due almost entirely to the February 1994 opening of Videorama, the first and only video rental outlet in the area that, in addition to renting videos, also sold them cheaply.
Brad: There must be another explanation: as you yourself said, the decline was on the order of 10,000 rentals. Yet Videorama sold only 4,000 videos in 1994.
Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the force of the objection that Brad presents to Jennifer's explanation?
(A) In 1994 Videorama rented out more videos than it sold.
(B) In 1994 two new outlets that rent but that do not sell videos opened in Centerville.
(C) Most of the video rental outlets in Centerville rent videos at a discount on certain nights of the week.
(D) People often buy videos of movies that they have previously seen in a theater.
People who own videos frequently loan them to their friends.
问题分析：首先这道题目的问题提示作用就比较大，问一下哪个选项将会驳斥B这个家伙的观点，那答案怎样着也得和B这个家伙的观点有点联系，原文说的关于b的观点是A这个店租的video下降了10000可能另有原因（不是jennifer提出的那个原因），因为租的video下降了10000，但是那个新开的B那个店只卖出去了4000个video。答案怎么着也得和卖出去这个东西有点联系，因为这是B这个家伙的objection。
A 说新开的B这个店租出去的比卖出去的多，和卖这个video有点联系，留着
B 说两个新的店（这两个店只租不卖）开业了，文章就不是围绕新开的这两个店谈的，杀
C 说在一定的时间会打折来租video，说的是租video的价格问题，你说一定时间会打折，无非是想让我联想成既然打折了，顾客就会去租，明显就是想骗我的主管答案。
D 说这帮买video的以前在电影院看过这个电影，主要强调这帮人是买的是以前看过的，显然没提，杀
E 说这帮拥有video的会把video借给朋友，和原文有些人买video有点联系，留着
A强调的是租的和卖得量哪个多的问题，而E强调的是我借给别人video的问题，文章探讨的显然是借video的问题而不是量多少问题，选E。E驳斥原文的方式如下其实很简单，就是有其他出口（希望你们能听懂这句，其实听不懂这句也没事，反正也做完了。）
