作者：英吉
The violent crime rate (number of violent crimes per 1,000 residents) in Meadowbrook is 60 percent higher now than it was four years ago. The corresponding increase for Parkdale is only 10 percent. These figures support the conclusion that residents of Meadowbrook are more likely to become victims of violent crime than are residents of Parkdale.
The argument above is flawed because it fails to take into account
A.changes in the population density of both Parkdale and Meadowbrook over the past four years
B.how the rate of population growth in Meadowbrook over the past four years compares to the corresponding rate for Parkdale
C.the ratio of violent to nonviolent crimes committed during the past four years in Meadowbrook and Parkdale
D.the violent crime rates in Meadowbrook and Parkdale four years ago
E.how Meadowbrook’s expenditures for crime prevention over the past four years compare to Parkdale’s expenditures
题目分析：原文说M这个城市的居民可能会更倒霉，我想说一句话让我感觉原文是错的，A说没有考虑两城市人口密度的变化，原文没围绕密度谈过，杀。B说人口增加的速度，没提，杀。C说非暴力犯罪，没提，杀。D说暴力犯罪率，提了，留着。E说用于预防犯罪的经费，没说，杀。
