In virtually any industry, technological improvements increase labor productivity, which is the output of goods and services per person-hour worked. In Parland's industries, labor productivity is significantly higher than it is in Vergia's industries. Clearly, therefore, Parland's industries must, on the whole, be further advanced technologically than Vergia's are.
The argument is most vulnerable to which of the following criticisms?
(A) It offers a conclusion that is no more than a paraphrase of one of the pieces of information provided in its support.
(B) It presents as evidence in support of a claim information that is inconsistent with other evidence presented in support of the same claim
(C) It takes one possible cause of a condition to be the actual cause of that condition without considering any other possible causes.
(D) It takes a condition to be the effect of something that happened only after the condition already existed.
(E) It makes a distinction that presupposes the truth of the conclusion that is to be established
题目分析：原文比较简单，问的是驳斥，C选项说没有考虑到其他因素，不管其他选项怎么说这个选项都是对的，因为原文无论怎么表达，模式就是A（论据）-B（结论），只要是这个模式，我的驳斥答案就可以说C（别的原因）—B，我们如果发现以后问题如果问原文中有什么错误，如果五个选项中有一个选项表达的是有别的因素要考虑，都可以不用看原文，直接选这个，这个选项一定是对的！
