博智教育 GMAT培训 GMAT每日一题
The fewer restrictions there are on the advertising of legal services, the more lawyers there are who advertise their services, and the lawyers who advertise a specific service usually charge less for that service than the lawyers who do not advertise.
Therefore, if the state removes any of its current restrictions, such as the one against advertisements that do not specify fee arrangements, overall consumer legal costs will be lower than if the state retains its current restrictions.
If the statements above are true, which of the following must be true?
(A) Some lawyers who now advertise will charge more for specific services if they do not have to specify fee arrangements in the advertisements.
(B) More consumers will use legal services if there are fewer restrictions on the advertising of legal services.
(C) If the restriction against advertisements that do not specify fee arrangements is removed, more lawyers will advertise their services.
(D) If more lawyers advertise lower prices for specific services, some lawyers who do not advertise will also charge less than they currently charge for those services.
(E) If the only restrictions on the advertising of legal services were those that apply to every type ot advertising, most lawyers would advertise their services.
题目分析：文章比较简单，我们直接看选项，A说如果state实行原文这个战术，那么一些律师将会收费更多，不是收费会变少吗？你问的是如果上文对，则哪个选项会是对的。答案至少在方向上和原文要一致啊，杀。B如果实施战术，更多的客户会使用法律服务，原文只是说实施战术后律师收费会变少，收费少了客户就会多？典型发散性选项。C说如果实施这个战术，更多律师会做广告，这个和原文方向比较一致，留着。D说如果越来越多的律师降低收费，那不做广告的律师收费也会拉低，不做广告的律师收费是否会拉低原文根本没提过，杀。E说那个条件就不是原文所说的那个政策，跑题了，杀。
博智教育 GMAT培训 GMAT每日一题
