博智教育 GMAT培训 GMAT每日一题
Journalist: In physics journals, the number of articles reporting the results of experiments involving particle accelerators was lower last year than it had been in previous years. Several of the particle accelerators at major research institutions were out of service the year before last for repairs, so it is likely that the low number of articles was due to the decline in availability of particle accelerators.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the journalist's argument?
(A) Every article based on experiments with particle accelerators that was submitted for publication last year actually was published.
(B) The average time scientists must wait for access to a particle accelerator has declined over the last several years.
(C) The number of physics journals was the same last year as in previous years.
(D) Particle accelerators can be used for more than one group of experiments in any given year.
(E) Recent changes in the editorial policies of several physics journals have decreased the likelihood that articles concerning particle- accelerator research will be accepted for publication.
题目分析：原文说最近报道research的量少是因为accelerators很多年久失修了。问驳斥，我听到这个选项应该感觉research的量少不是原文那个原因，A说每一篇报道都出版了，出版了为什么还少，不能驳斥，杀。B说接触accelerators的时间下降了，围绕时间谈就跑题了，杀。C说journal的数量多少，跑的很严重，杀。D说accelerator必须用于不止一组实验，没说，杀。E说最近政策的变化导致报道research的文章就不能出版了，那就不是原文说的那个原因了，可以驳斥，选E
博智教育 GMAT培训 GMAT每日一题
