Only a reduction of 10 percent in the number of scheduled flights using Greentown's airport will allow the delays that are so common there to be avoided. Hevelia airstrip, 40 miles away, would, if upgraded and expanded, be an attractive alternative for fully 20 percent of the passengers using Greentown airport.
Nevertheless, experts reject the claim that turning Hevelia into a full-service airport would end the chronic delays at Greentown.
Which of the following, if true, most helps to justify the experts' position?
(A)Turning Hevelia into a full-service airport would require not only substantial construction at the airport itself, but also the construction of new access highways.
(B)A second largely undeveloped airstrip close to Greentown airport would be a more attractive alternative than Hevelia for many passengers who now use Greentown.
(C)Hevelia airstrip lies in a relatively undeveloped area but would, if it became a full-service airport, be a magnet for commercial and residential development.
(D)If an airplane has to wait to land, the extra jet fuel required adds significantly to the airline's costs.
(E)Several airlines use Greentown as a regional hub, so that most flights landing at Greentown have many passengers who then take different flights to reach their final destinations.
题目分析：原文很简单，A地太挤了，B地可以作为缓解局面的地方，但是专家说你挪到B地方也不能缓解A地的拥挤。问支持这个观点。A说改造B地需要建造很多东西，这个和要缓解A地的拥挤有什么关系？干掉。B说有别的地方比B这个地方更合适，范围不对了吧，干掉。C说如果用了B地那么这个地方商业和居住都会有很大发展，这个也跑题了，干掉。D说如果飞机拥挤，耗掉的油会更多，会更费钱，没什么关系。E说很多乘客到A地方是中转的，那去了B地不也没用了嘛，我不能去B，所以选这个。
