作者：英吉
The traditional treatment of strep infections has been a seven-day course of antibiotics, either penicillin or erythromycin. However, since many patients stop taking those drugs within three days, reinfection is common in cases where those drugs are prescribed. A new antibiotic requires only a three-day course of treatment. Therefore, reinfection will probably be less common in cases where the new antibiotic is prescribed than in cases where either penicillin or erythromycin is prescribed.
Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?
A.Some of the people who are allergic to penicillin are likely to be allergic to the new antibiotic.
B.A course of treatment with the new antibiotic costs about the same as a course of treatment with either penicillin or erythromycin.
C.The new antibiotic has been shown to be effective in eradicating bacterial infections other than strep.
D.Some physicians have already begun to prescribe the new antibiotic instead of penicillin or erythromycin for the treatment of some strep infections.
E.Regardless of whether they take a traditional antibiotic or the new one, most patients feel fully recovered after taking the drug for three days.
题目分析：我们今天继续用场景训练法来看看这道逻辑题，原文说用新的治疗方法比老的方法有效，因为新的方法只需要治疗三天，老的方法需要七天以上，问支持，就等于五个选项拍马屁，我们看看哪个拍的到位。A说这些用老的抗生素的人将可能对新的抗生素也过敏，是否过敏，原文谈的就不是这个，没拍到位，杀。B说用新的治疗方法和老的方法成本是一样的，成本是否一样原文没说过钱的问题，杀。C说新的抗生素将能够有效的去除病菌，原文也没说过这个主题，杀。D说一些一声开始用新的方法来治疗，原文谈的是新的方法和老的方法治疗时间多少来谈哪个方法有效，这个选项说医生用新的，没拍到位，杀。E说不管用新的还是用老的方法，病人在三天之后都感觉自己好了，这样感觉三天后停药的可能性大了一些，留着，拍的比较到位！
